Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Roger Stone draws line in sand, invokes 5th Amendment
Florida Politics

Roger Stone draws line in sand, invokes 5th Amendment

319
0

“Mr. Stone respectfully declines to produce any documents and declines the invitation for an interview.

Mr. Stone decries secrecy. He will not subject himself to the innuendo of non-public proceedings. Nor will he confirm the existence of, or produce the documents of the request, for the purpose of being used in secret proceedings.”-Attorney Grant Smith

The line has been drawn in the sand, as Roger Stone says he will invoke his 5th Amendment right.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Floridian Press updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

According to his Attorney Brian Smith, the long-time advisor to President Donald Trump will not furnish documents requested by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D), Ranking Minority Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Smith penned a letter to Sen. Feinstein expressing his clients concerns about the “far too overboard, far too overreaching, far too wide ranging” request.

After Stone publicly stated that he would “never testify” against the president, President Trump tweet it was “nice to know that some people still have “guts!”

Here is how Smith’s letter to Feinstein reads:

On the advice of counsel, Mr. Stone will not produce the documents requested by you in your capacity as Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committee. The requests, as previously stated to staff, are far too overbroad, far too overreaching, far too wide ranging both in their all-embracing list of persons to whom the request could relate with whom Mr. Stone has communicated over the past three years, and the “documents concerning” imprecision of the requests.

 For the additional reasons set forth below, Mr. Stone respectfully declines to produce any documents and declines the invitation for an interview.

Mr. Stone decries secrecy. He will not subject himself to the innuendo of non-public proceedings. Nor will he confirm the existence of, or produce the documents of the request, for the purpose of being used in secret proceedings.

I hardly need to say that the gossip and innuendo which surrounds Mr. Stone in the press, in Congress and, according to news reports, in the Special Counsel’s offices, provides him with a reasonable basis to protect himself from the “ambiguous circumstances” which some have embraced.

The production of documents that may be responsive to the unreasonably broad scope of the imprecise, fishing expedition, request would unquestionably be a testimonial act protected by the U.S. Constitution. The United States Supreme Court has held that the production of documents is subject to Fifth Amendment protection. In Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178, 187-188 (1957), Chief Justice Warren made the pointed argument that, “the constitutional rights of witnesses will be respected by the Congress as they are in a court of justice…Witnesses cannot be compelled to give evidence against themselves.”

When the Constitutional rights issue was later applied to documents that were the subject of a broad subpoena by an independent counsel, the Court in United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000), held that the Constitutional right not to be compelled to give testimony against oneself was applicable to the production of documents that would be testimonial in nature. Whether the documents requested by the Senate Committee exist or not, they are subject to a Fifth Amendment claim.

This reply in response to the request by you, is written with the utmost respect for the Committee and its staff. Mr. Stone’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege must be understood by all to be the assertion of a Constitutional right by an innocent citizen who denounces secrecy.

Tagged:

Javier Manjarres is a nationally renowned award-winning South Florida-based political journalist owns Diverse New Media, Corp. which publishes Floridianpress.com, Judicialpost.com, shark-tank.com, and Hispolitica.com He enjoys traveling, playing soccer, mixed martial arts, weight-lifting, swimming and biking. He ran as a Republican in the 2018 congressional primary race in Florida's CD 22. Javier is also a political consultant, and has also authored "BROWN PEOPLE," which is a book about Hispanic Politics. Learn more at www.brownpeople.org Email him at [email protected]

richard corcoran
FloridaFlorida Politics
Corcoran continues pushing his “Make Florida Great” campaign
Corcoran is once again reminding Floridians of the work he has done to crack down on [...]
'Rosy' Palomino
Florida PoliticsMIami
Palomino set to rechallenge State Rep. Nicholas Duran
In the end, this race, will boil down to who can raise the money to win
Phillip Levine
FloridaFlorida Politics
Phillip Levine, the everyone’s gubernatorial candidate?
The likable and charismatic mayor of Miami Beach, Phillip Levine, is considered by [...]