Republican Melissa Martz Files Highly-Questionable FEC Report

Republican Melissa Martz Files Highly-Questionable FEC Report

The report reads that $121,800 in car magnets was donated to the campaign

Javier Manjarres
Javier Manjarres
July 5, 2021

In the first federal fundraising quarter for her 2022 Republican congressional primary against Rep. Brian Mast (R), self-styled Constitutionalist and Attorney Melissa Martz (R) has reported raising just over $200,000 but has burned just about all of it.

Having an almost 100 % burn rate is not a good sign for any campaign, but in Martz’s case, it raising political eyebrows considering how the money was spent on.

According to her most recent FEC report, of the $203,370.59 raised, $6,171.59 was contributed by Martz herself in four separate primary only contributions.

Usually, when a candidate contributes any amount of money to their campaign it is logged in as a “Loan,” but Martz’s doesn’t list the transactions as loans rather as donations.

This has to be a mistake because the maximum amount any one individual can donate to any congressional campaign through the general election cycle is $5,800.

Martz’s husband Peter Martz also donated the $2,900 maximum primary donation to her campaign.

But the bigger question about Martz’s campaign finances is how the money was spent.

In-Kind donations are part of any campaign, but the amount of In-Kind donations made to Martz’s campaign is highly irregular.

Martz received 42 individual contributions of $2,900 for “Market car magnet” or “Marketing car advertisement. That’s $121,800, and it means that these 42 donors each took it upon themselves to purchase Martz for Congress car magnets or car advertising.

With the average cost of a car magnet being around $30, not including any bulk discounts,  Martz supporters apparently bought about 4000 car magnets.

Some 5 other $2,900 in-kind donations were made for “marketing” and Martz’s husband took back his $2,900. Of that $2,900, $900 went to “printing” while the other $2,000 is not itemized.

Of the $6,171.59 Martz donated to her campaign, it appears that $1,000 of that was an In-Kind donation to her campaign for a fundraising ticket purchased to attend an event at Mar-a-Lago.

There are also quite a few expenses like photography, lodging, and more marketing, that have been listed as In-Kind donations, which are probably campaign expenses Martz incurred but reported incorrectly.

The filing is sloppy, and this is usually the case when the candidate or someone not familiar with FEC filings is the listed Treasurer. Martz is the listed Treasurer of her campaign. Federal campaign treasurers take on the legal responsibilities and must ensure, verify, and be able to prove that the monies received that she or he signs off on, are legally obtained.

But with that said, there are 42 people who have donated $121,800 worth of car magnets. We are still trying to wrap our heads around this. Something just doesn’t smell right.

Are these car magnet donations actually legitimate, or did Martz ask these donors if she could list them as actual donors who made these in-kind donations?

What is the name of the printing company that produced the car magnets?

The Melissa Martz for Congress campaign only has $5,348.06 in the bank. Rep. Mast has $1,338,861.61

Oh, by the way, what is she aiming at?

Melissa Martz

Melissa Martz

Related Posts

Javier Manjarres

Javier Manjarres

Javier Manjarres is a nationally renowned award-winning political journalist and Publisher of,,, and He enjoys traveling, playing soccer, mixed martial arts, weight-lifting, swimming, and biking. Javier is also a political consultant and has also authored "BROWN PEOPLE," which is a book about Hispanic Politics. Follow on Twitter: @JavManjarres Email him at

Subscribe to the newsletter everyone in Florida is reading.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Thank you for your interest in receiving the The Floridian newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.