Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Verdict upheld in exploding E-cigarette case

Verdict upheld in exploding E-cigarette case


A state appeals court Tuesday upheld a verdict of more than $2 million in a case involving an electronic cigarette that exploded and caused damage to a man’s teeth. A three-judge panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal rejected arguments by R-L Sales, LLC, which sold a lithium ion battery used in the electronic cigarette. The Alachua County case was filed by J. Michael Hoce against companies that made and sold the electronic cigarette and components, including R-L Sales.

At the time of trial, R-L Sales was the only remaining defendant and was found at fault by a jury, according to Tuesday’s ruling by a three-judge panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal. The jury awarded $48,000 for medical expenses and $2 million in pain-and-suffering damages for Hoce, who had several teeth damaged in the e-cigarette explosion.

In the appeal, R-L Sales argued, in part, that the trial judge should have allowed it to introduce evidence that Hoce used methamphetamine that had damaged his teeth. But the appeals court turned down the argument.

Trending: Trump’s “Go Back” Tweet Sparks Verbal War

“Although the fact that appellee (Hoce) already had extensive dental problems was relevant to the jury’s determination of the extent of damages attributable to the e-cigarette explosion, the cause of appellee’s preexisting dental problems — i.e., whether it was meth use, too many sugary drinks, or simply extremely poor dental hygiene — was not relevant to any issue the jury had to decide,” said the ruling by Chief Judge Stephanie Ray and judges Clay Roberts and T. Kent Wetherell.

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?

  • Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Floridian Press updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Moreover, because evidence of illegal drug use is inherently prejudicial, even if the cause of appellee’s preexisting dental problems had some marginal relevance, the probative value of the evidence that appellee was a meth user was substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect.” Also, the appeals court rejected arguments that the jury award was excessive, saying that while it is “substantial, it has adequate record support, and it is not so large that it shocks the judicial conscience.”

News Service of Florida

Villages 4
FeaturedFlorida Politics
DeSantis pledges cheaper Rx drugs for Floridians
  DeSantis will look to work with the Trump Administration and the Florida [...]
Screen Shot 2018-09-27 at 10.52.28 AM
FeaturedFloridaFlorida Politics
Florida Democrats React to Kavanaugh’s Confirmation
Finally, Nikki Fried, making a run to become Florida's next Agriculture Commissioner, [...]
Screen Shot 2019-02-06 at 10.17.35 AM
FeaturedFloridaFlorida Politics
Tommy Gregory Files Bill to Fly Honor and Remember Flag
“I look forward to our state adopting this flag as a symbol of unwavering support and [...]