Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Rubio questions motives behind Mueller probe, wants to see entire report
FeaturedU.S. Congress

Rubio questions motives behind Mueller probe, wants to see entire report

223
0
0SHARES

The “principle conclusions” of the Mueller Russian probe investigation have been released by U.S. Attorney General William Barr, and the overall summary of these conclusions is that Trump, or anyone involved in his presidential campaign, colluded with Russians to alter the 2019 presidential election.

“The special counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its effort” to interfere with the 2016 election in that manner.”- Attorney General William Barr

Congressional Democrats are not happy with the findings, as they were hoping that collusion between Russian agents and the Trump campaign existed.

Now these same Democrats  are threatening to call Mueller to testify before congress.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?(2)

  • Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Floridian Press updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Democrats also want the entire investigation’s findings released, as does Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who has consistently said that the Mueller investigation should be allowed to run its course because it would benefit the president and the country.

Rubio: “I want to see all of it. What was the underlying criminal predicate for the entire investigation? Let’s see the FISA applications, because this was an extraordinary use of government surveillance power and we have legal reasons why you might be able to use it, but show us what those were. What was the underlying predicate for those FISA applications? Let’s see all of that, let’s put all of that out there as well so we can pass judgment about how the investigation was conducted, or at least the predicate for the investigation was conducted during the Obama years.    

“[P]rosecution, and everything that has to do with prosecution and counterintelligence, that’s an executive function. And so frankly, the President does have the power to fire the prosecutor, and does have the power to prejudice an investigation if they so choose. And there’s a remedy for that. Number one, the President is politically accountable and second of all, the President, if they’ve done things or abused power, they can be impeached. If the House wants to make that argument, then they can.

That hasn’t happened yet. But I think that’s separate from the Mueller report and separate from what’s going to be released to the public. I would suspect that at the end of the day, they are going to release the report, they’re going to redact intelligence information or classified information, and they are not going to put things in there about people, that is damaging to people that chose not to prosecute. But that’s not unique to the President, that is the way the Justice Department handles every case. They don’t go out there and smear people and then say ‘but we chose not to prosecute them anyway.’

“There are things like internal deliberations inside of the administration that you don’t want out there because then it gets difficult for the President to talk to people. But I would certainly ask the President to lean towards transparency because I’ve been very clear from the very beginning, I wanted the Mueller probe, I wanted it to be conducted without any interference, because I believed, and I said this, you can go back to the tape and find me saying this now for two years, that when it was all said and done the best thing for the country and for the President is for this probe to move forward and to be concluded. And that’s what’s happened now. And so we want to learn as much as we possibly can that’s allowed and permissible under Justice Department policy and, of course, the law of the country.

      

0SHARES
Tagged:

Javier Manjarres is a nationally renowned award-winning South Florida-based political journalist owns Diverse New Media, Corp. which publishes Floridianpress.com, Judicialpost.com, shark-tank.com, and Hispolitica.com He enjoys traveling, playing soccer, mixed martial arts, weight-lifting, swimming and biking. He ran as a Republican in the 2018 congressional primary race in Florida's CD 22. Javier is also a political consultant, and has also authored "BROWN PEOPLE," which is a book about Hispanic Politics. Learn more at www.brownpeople.org Email him at [email protected]

Screen Shot 2018-12-17 at 8.55.21 AM
FeaturedU.S. Congress
Democrats eye impeachment after Mueller report
The report didn’t find enough to warrant indictments, but did cast Trump in a bad [...]
FLA Ticket array v1
FeaturedFlorida
Lottery giant wins another big award
Scientific Games, which has created and manufactured the Florida Lottery’s [...]
Screen Shot 2019-01-14 at 1.36.23 PM
FeaturedFloridaFlorida Politics
Democrats push to protect healthcare pre-existing conditions
"No person should worry that they may be one hospital bill away from bankruptcy [...]